As he Prepares to Leave Office, Gov. Deval Patrick Hopes his Second Proposal to Restrict the Use of Restrictive Covenants will One Day become Law
By Jack K. Merrill, Esq.
If the governor gets his way, his legacy will include restrictions on noncompetition agreements that, he hopes, will give an economic boost to the Commonwealth by removing impediments to growth. The question is whether Deval Patrick’s current proposal will fare any better than the first one he filed, which died without a vote this summer.
Mr. Patrick’s current bill is, he says, adjusted by lessons he learned during a legislative go-round that followed a noncompetition bill he filed earlier this year. Then, the governor proposed a ban on the agreements. Now, he’s hoping to simply enact what he sees as a balanced approach that would allow restrictive covenants when certain conditions are met.
Buried within the proposal – which is unlikely to be enacted during Mr. Patrick’s final term as governor because the legislature is not formally in session – is the underlying question, “why?” The governor’s answer is that non-competes impede economic growth by restricting employee movement. But while it’s easy to see how banning them might affect this perceived problem, it’s less clear whether procedural limits on them will do so.
To be sure, the governor’s current plan will not eliminate non-competes in Massachusetts. Indeed, it appears unlikely that it will even curtail their use. While Mr. Patrick would ban restrictive covenants for some employees – anyone who is not exempt from overtime laws – those affected by the exemption will likely be lower-level workers who are not often the subject of enforcement actions anyway. For others, non-competes will be allowed, just as they are today, if employers comply with a few simple rules. [Read more...]